|


FOP COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING BILL NO LONGER INCLUDED
IN WAR SUPPLEMENTAL – SENATE LEADERSHIP PROMISES A VOTE
THIS YEAR (Details in this report)
Washington Watch: Legislative Update
For the Week of 19 July 2010
I. Legislative News and Activity
II. This Week in Congress
III. Update on FOP Top Legislative Priorities
IV. Update on LEOSA
V. 2010 Model Questionnaire Released!!!
I. LEGISLATIVE NEWS AND ACTIVITY
Executive Director Jim Pasco met this week with White House
Associate Director of Political Affairs, Nate Tameron to discuss the issue
of collective bargaining and other FOP top legislative priorities.
Executive Director Pasco also met with various Staff of House leadership to
discuss the recent Senate action to strip the 2010 War Supplemental (H.R.
4899) of all non-germane conditions and spending. He discussed the urgent
need to get collective bargaining included in another legislative vehicle
that would help provide passage of this FOP priority. Legislative Affairs
continues to seek a remedy for this action.
The FOP submitted letters of support to Congressional leadership this week
in favor of H.R.725 – “The Tribal Law and Order Act of 2009.” The bill
significantly improves Federal, State, Local and Tribal law enforcement
officer safety, as well as public safety by allowing the expansion of the
National Crime Information Database to tribal law enforcement officers
allowing them to retrieve and share information on crimes committed in the
tribal community. The bill also provides for increased and more rigorous
training of tribal law enforcement by members of the Federal law enforcement
community. The bill passed both the House and Senate and President Obama
has announced his support for it as well.
II. THIS WEEK IN CONGRESS
The House and the Senate were in session this week.
Action in the House
This week, Democrats in Congress broke a Republican filibuster and
passed legislation to extend unemployment benefits. 2.5 million unemployed
people will get payments retroactive to the time they stopped receiving
benefits. The House of Representatives voted 272-152 on Thursday to pass the
bill, and the Senate passed it by a 59-39 vote on Wednesday.
Action in the Senate
Elena Kagan, U.S. Supreme Court nominee, won approval from the
Senate Judiciary Committee this past Tuesday. The vote was 13-6, with Sen.
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., joining the majority Democrats. Graham's vote
ensures that Democrats will have the 60 votes necessary to overcome a
potential Republican filibuster of the nomination. Kagan’s final hurdle
comes when the full Senate votes on her nomination in the coming weeks.
The Senate effectively rejected the House version of War Supplemental (HR
4899) in a procedural vote late Thursday, 46-51. It then sent its
slimmer version of the supplemental, originally passed in May, back to the
House by unanimous consent. The House is expected to concede the Senate’s
stripped bill.
III. UPDATE ON FOP TOP LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES
For the complete list of cosponsors for all of our top
legislative priorities, or to find out if your Representative and Senators
are cosponsors of specific bills, check out
http://thomas.loc.gov .
A. Social Security Issues
(1) Support H.R. 235/S. 484, the "Social Security Fairness Act"
We currently have a total of three hundred and twenty-two (322)
cosponsors on H.R. 235--more than a House majority! Please note that this
total differs slightly from THOMAS, as we are not including six (6)
Representatives who are no longer serving in Congress, nor the three (3)
Delegates, who have limited voting rights on the floor.
We currently have thirty (30) cosponsors on S. 484. Please note that this
total differs slightly from THOMAS, as we are not including in our count
Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA), who died last year. Senator Kennedy's
successor, Senator Scott P. Brown (R-MA), is not currently a cosponsor of
the bill.
(2) Opposing any legislation that would require the participation of
public employees in Social Security
The FOP will continue to lobby against this scheme and oppose any
legislation which would mandate participation in Social Security.
B. Support H.R. 413/S. 1611/S. 3194, the "Public Safety
Employer-Employee Cooperation Act" No longer a War Supplemental add-on
The "Public Safety
Employer-Employee Cooperation Act"
The Senate passed an emergency supplemental
spending bill to fund the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, forcibly setting
aside a House package that included language addressing collective
bargaining and fund for additional social spending.
The Senate action late Thursday sends the stripped package back to the House
for its consideration. The provisions included by the Senate are funding to
support troops serving in Iraq and in Afghanistan, the funding that
addresses the damage caused by several natural disasters, and funding to
respond to the economic and environmental impacts of the Deepwater Horizon
oil spill. The bill also adds money to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency's disaster relief fund. Senator Reid has indicated his commitment to
pass the bill this year with the possibility of floor time in September and
addressing it during the Lame Duck session. Aggressive efforts by FOP Staff,
in conjunction with Leadership and Staff are being made to incorporate this
bill into moving legislation.
C. Support H.R. 1972, the "Law Enforcement Officer’s Procedural Bill
of Rights Act"
We currently have (9) cosponsors on H.R. 1972.
The Senate companion bill has not yet been introduced.
D. Support H.R. 673, the “Law Enforcement Officers’ Equity Act"
We currently have thirty-two (32) cosponsors on H.R. 673. Please
note that this total differs slightly from THOMAS, as we are not including
in our count two (2) Representative no longer serving in Congress.
The Senate companion bill has not yet been introduced.
IV. UPDATE ON LEGISLATION AMENDING LEOSA
In May, the Senate passed S. 1132 by unanimous consent. This legislation
has been referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary for further
consideration.
Last week, National Legislative staff met with staff members for the
Chairman and Ranking Member of the Judiciary Committee regarding S. 1132.
This week, they met with staff members in the office of the House Majority
Leader to discuss how the bill might be considered on the House floor.
We currently have thirteen (13) cosponsors on H.R. 3752. Please note we are
not including in our count two (2) Representatives who are no longer serving
in Congress. The bill is similar in most respects to the Senate companion
bill, S. 1132. The House bill includes language that would also clarify the
status of retired military personnel that served as law enforcement officers
in their respective branch of service.
V. 2010 MODEL CONGRESSIONAL QUESTIONNAIRE RELEASED!!!
Staff in the National Legislative Office have prepared a model questionnaire
for State and local Lodges to aid them in evaluating candidates for
Congress. The questions are drawn from issues being lobbied by the Grand
Lodge on Capitol Hill.
It is particularly important for the State and local Lodges to endorse
candidates who support our top priority items and oppose those candidates
who do not. The success of the National Legislative Program depends on
having an active grassroots base and on electing lawmakers who support our
pro-law enforcement agenda.
The Model Questionnaire can be found on the Grand Lodge website:
www.fop.net in the Washington Watch
section and on the home page of the National Legislative Office home
page (
http://www.fop.net/legislative/index.shtml ).
Contact the National Legislative Office if you have any questions.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
National Fraternal Order of Police PAC
Contribution Form
Please return the form and
contribution to:
National Fraternal Order of Police PAC
328 Massachusetts Ave., N.E.
Washington, DC 20002
Name of Contributor ______________________________________
Occupation _____________________________________________________
Employer ______________________________________________________
Home Address _____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
Phone # ________________________________________________
E-mail Address __________________________________________
Contribution Amount (Please circle one):
$25 $50 $100 $150 $200 Other $______
Date ______________________________
Is contributor a member of the F.O.P.? Y N
A. If YES, please list:
F.O.P. State Lodge __________________________________
F.O.P. Local Lodge __________________________________
F.O.P. Membership # ________________________________
B. If NO, please list:
F.O.P. Member’s Name ____________________________________
Your Relationship to F.O.P. Member _________________________
(son, daughter, spouse, etc.)
Contributions or gifts to the National Fraternal Order of Police PAC are not
tax deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
Only PERSONAL or NON CORPORATE checks may be accepted. A contribution of
$25 is suggested, but please contribute more if you are able, and a lesser
amount if you are not. Contributions to the NATL FOP PAC are strictly
voluntary and FOP members have the right to refuse to contribute without
reprisal. Your contribution will be used to support candidates for federal
office who support law enforcement. Federal law requires political action
committees to report the name, mailing address, occupation and name of
employer for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200
per calendar year
Posted 7/26/2010
ACT NOW!!!!

US House of Representatives Passes
Collective Bargaining Bill
The
United States House of Representatives has passed the Public Safety
Employer-Employee Safety Act. By a vote of 239-182 The House included HR
413 in the supplemental appropriations act.
The
Bill now proceeds to the Senate who will take it up after the July 4th
recess. It is vital that FOP Lodges around this country make contact with
your Senators and tell them we NEED their vote. The scare tactics of the
National Right to Work Foundation and other groups must be countered with
facts. Our Senator's inbox needs to be FULL upon their return from the
4th of July recess with messages from the FOP.
THIS HAS TO BE DONE IMMEDIATELY!!!
TAKE
THE TIME RIGHT NOW TO
CONTACT YOUR SENATORS!!!
Take 2 MINUTES to send them an email or call their office and simply say
this:
Dear
Senator ________,
I am
writing to ask that you support the inclusion of H.R. 413/S. 1611, the
"Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act," into H.R. 4899, the
"Supplemental Appropriations Act," and to vote against any amendments to
the collective bargaining bill language.
The
Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act will;
1.
Prohibits Strikes and concerted work actions.
2.
Calls for states to pass their own laws.
3.
Provides a method of resolving differences in the bargaining process.
It's
time for public safety officers to have the same basic right that has been
afforded to the private sector for the past 75 years.
Your
support is VERY important to protecting working police officers throughout
the county and in our state.
Respectfully,
__________
That's
it... all you have to do is
cut &
paste
with your Senator's name at the top and your name at the bottom.
Just 2 minutes to
invest in the future of police officers, particularly those who do not
have collective bargaining. SUPPORT
YOUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS!!! You can call your Senator and say
the very same thing. They're not going to ask you questions, they will
just put your email or call in the "YES" pile.
FIND YOUR SENATORS HERE
READ THE UPDATE LETTER FROM
NATIONAL PRESIDENT CANTERBURY HERE
THIS COULD BE THE MOST IMPORTANT
TIME IN OUR HISTORY!!!
ARE YOU READY FOR YOUR INDEPENDENCE
ON THIS 4TH OF JULY???
ACT NOW!!!!
Posted 6/10/2010
Passing of Gov.
McDonnell's Budget Amendment
Brothers and Sisters,
It is my pleasure to report to you that the House and the Senate passed
Governor Bob McDonnell's budget amendment dealing with retirement for
local government employees.
I am asking you to send an email to the Governor thanking him for
helping us out with this. Governor McDonnell took a strong stance on
this issue and spoke to many legislators to make this happen.
www.bobmcdonnell.com
At Rally Day I told you that the battle this year would be to hold on
the benefits we have. I hate to say I told you so, but I was right in my
assessment. Please don't wait until the last minute to recommend
legislative suggestions for next years session. Next year is the start
of an election year. We will probably have eager members in the General
Assembly interested in sponsoring legislation.
Stay safe and keep your head down.
Fraternally,
Kevin P. Carroll
Received 5/26/2010
LEGISLATIVE ALERT:
The FOP-IAFF collective bargaining bill has been offered as an amendment
to H.R. 4899, the "Supplemental Appropriations Act"
Yesterday morning, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid
(D-NV) offered the text of S. 1611/S. 3194, the "Public Safety
Employer-Employee Cooperation Act," as an amendment to H.R. 4899, the
"Supplemental Appropriations Act," which provides additional funding for
U.S. military forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as disaster relief for
areas affected by the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
For the last thirty-six hours, the staff in the National Legislative Office
has been involved in intense negotiations with our allies in the Senate in
an effort to ensure that the amendment will be considered. It is very
likely that the opponents of the bill will object to its being offered on a
spending bill--known as a "Rule 16" objection. In other words, we expect
the amendment to be ruled out of order.
We want to ensure that all of our members are fully informed as this
procedural maneuvering plays out, so as not to be taken in by false rumors,
like the "carve out" amendment. Senator Michael B. Enzi (R-WY), the
Ranking Member on the Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions
(HELP), has offered seven second degree amendments to the collective
bargaining amendment. The staff in the National Legislative Office has
reviewed the language from all amendments, none of which would "carve out"
any particular State, office or agency. If the amendment should be
considered, we will oppose each of the second degree amendments.
Again, while we expect the amendment to be challenged
under the rules of the Senate, it is an excellent opportunity for FOP
members to contact their Senators and ask them to support Senator Reid's
amendment, S. Amdt. 4174!!!
FOP members can call their Senators at their Washington offices (or through
the U.S. Capitol Switchboard at 202-224-3121) and urge them to support S.
Amdt. 4174!!!
REMEMBER: the bill does not require binding
arbitration, protects existing right-to-work laws, and specifically
prohibits strikes and lockouts. The legislation merely requires that States
“substantially provide” for the following rights and responsibilities:
- � the right to form and join a labor organization;
- � the right to bargain over hours, wages, and
the terms and conditions of employment; and
- � the availability of an “interest impasse
resolution mechanism such as fact-finding, mediation, arbitration, or
comparable procedures".
Additional talking points to use when making your case:
- In the previous Congress, this legislation, was passed by the U.S.
House of Representatives on a 314-97 vote.
- The House bill won a majority of votes from BOTH party
caucuses.
- The Senate bill has strong bipartisan support.
- In the previous Congress, the Senate voted 69-29 in favor of cloture
on a motion to proceed to consider the legislation (RCV #126).
- The bottom line for both public safety employers and employees is not
profit for shareholders, but to best ensure the safety of the officers, to
bring them home safely at the end of their shift and to deliver emergency
services in the fastest and most efficient way possible.
- It is irresponsible and offensive to suggest that collective
bargaining would impede or jeopardize the ability of law enforcement
officers to do their jobs. Their lives are on the line everyday,
agreement or no agreement and to suggest that response to a critical
incident would be used as a bargaining chip is reprehensible.
You can get additional information on the bill, and can direct Senate
staff to, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on the Grand Lodge website:
http://www.fop.net/legislative/issues/bargain/hr413s1611faq.pdf
If any of the Senator's staff that you speak with have additional
questions about the legislation, tell them to contact Tim Richardson at in
the FOP's National Legislative Office at 202-547-8189
CALL NOW AND WATCH YOUR EMAIL AND THE FOP WEBSITE FOR
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE ALERTS!!!
Received 5/27/2010
FOP PRESIDENT DEFENDS AZ LAW ENFORCEMENT
Profiling Charges are “Offensive”
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police,
stated his strong support for law enforcement officers in Arizona, who will
soon be charged with enforcing the new State statute to combat illegal
immigration and human trafficking.
“Our members in Arizona are justifiably offended with some of the
assumptions that have been made by the media, pundits, and even elected
officials who insinuate or state outright that these professional law
enforcement officers will use the new law as a pretext to engage in unlawful
racial profiling,” Canterbury said. “They are angry and rightly so.”
The statute, Arizona Senate Bill 1070, the Support Our Law Enforcement and
Safe Neighborhoods Act, has been criticized by many outside of the State as
being too harsh or unfair to persons unlawfully present in the United States
and Arizona. From the perspective of Arizona law enforcement officers, it
is extremely offensive to suggest that the law means officers will engage in
racial profiling.
“Honest policy differences are both healthy and expected in the public
forum, but some critics have really crossed the line,” Canterbury said. “In
their haste to criticize the law, I do not think they have stopped to think
that its very insulting to law enforcement officers to hear that they will
engage in biased policing, as if these officers do not understand the
concept of reasonable suspicion or probable cause.”
The law, which will go into effect this summer, obligates officers to make
an attempt, when practicable, during a lawful stop to determine the
individual’s immigration status if there is
a “reasonable suspicion” that the person is in the United States illegally.
The individual may be arrested if there is probable cause to believe that
their presence is unlawful.
“Law enforcement officers are trained in the police academy to recognize
reasonable suspicion and probable cause,” Canterbury said. “These officers
put their lives on the line for the public�we entrust them to make life and
death decisions in a fraction of a second. You do not have to attack the
law by attacking the integrity of these brave men and women.”
Milder critics of the statute argue that officers in Arizona will need
additional training to ensure that they do not engage in racial profiling.
The Arizona FOP State Lodge rejects this claim, stating that what is truly
needed is additional funding for the 287(g) program, which provides State
and local law enforcement with training and the authorization to identify,
process, and when appropriate, detain persons they encounter during their
regular, daily law-enforcement activity who are illegally present in the
United States.
“This is a very unique and detailed training that cannot be taught in a 60
to 90 minute video,” said Bryan Soller, the State Lodge President of the
Arizona State Lodge, said of the 287(g) program. “We need a clear direction
on what proper documentation is, how to recognize forged documentation, the
proper questioning format, and how to complete the proper ICE forms.”
“One of the genuine concerns that law enforcement does have with this new
law is its potential costs,” Canterbury said. “Whatever these costs are,
local governments, which are already on very tight budgets, will bear them.”
“The one thing I do know is that the Arizona law enforcement community will
find a way to make SB1070 work,” Soller said.
 |
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 14, 2010
|
MEDIA CONTACT
Kevin Morison, NLEOMF
kevin@nleomf.org | (202) 737-7134
|
Groundbreaking Set for National Law
Enforcement Museum
Washington, DC
– With strong backing from America’s law enforcement, corporate
and philanthropic communities, the National Law Enforcement
Officers Memorial Fund (NLEOMF) announced today that it will break
ground in October on the first-ever
National Law Enforcement Museum in Washington, DC.
Groundbreaking will take place on
October 14, 2010. The Museum will be built on Federal land across
the street from the existing National Law Enforcement Officers
Memorial in historic Judiciary Square, the symbolic seat of the
nation’s criminal justice system. A gala celebration is planned
for that evening at the National Building Museum. The National Law
Enforcement Museum is scheduled to open in late 2013.
“Almost ten years after Congress
authorized this project, and following a lot of hard work,
planning and generosity from the law enforcement community,
corporate America and caring citizens, we are very excited and
eager to get shovels in the ground later this year,” said
Craig W. Floyd, chairman and chief executive officer of the
Memorial Fund. “Law enforcement officers have been serving and
sacrificing for our nation dating back to the earliest days of
American history. Their story needs and deserves to be told,” he
declared.
The non-profit NLEOMF, which built
and maintains the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, is
also leading the effort to build the National Law Enforcement
Museum. The
NLEOMF’s governing body is composed of top officials from 16
national law enforcement organizations.
The
55,000-square-foot, mostly underground institution will be a
world-class experiential museum with high-tech interactive
exhibitions. The Museum will include a vast collection of law
enforcement artifacts and dedicated spaces for research and
education.
Visitor experiences will range from
assuming the role of a police dispatcher in the Motorola 911
Emergency Call Center; to making split-second, life-or-death
decisions posed by the use-of-force judgment simulator; to solving
crimes in the Museum’s Target Forensics Lab. Other major
exhibitions will focus on the history of law enforcement,
corrections, tools of the trade, and a fascinating look at a day
in the life of an officer. The “Reel to Real” exhibit will give
visitors the opportunity to compare real-life law enforcement with
depictions in the movies and on television.
In the Museum’s Hall of
Remembrance, visitors will learn the inspirational stories of the
nearly 19,000 fallen heroes whose names are inscribed on the
National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial. A changing exhibits
gallery sponsored by DuPont will focus on topical issues of the
day and delve deeper into some of the milestone moments of law
enforcement’s past.
One of the most comprehensive
collections of law enforcement artifacts in the United States will
be used by the Museum for its exhibitions, educational programs
and research activities. The Museum’s collection already comprises
more than 10,000 objects, including a 1703 sheriff’s writ (the
oldest artifact in the collection), items from the 1932 Lindbergh
baby kidnapping case and trial, Al Capone’s bullet-resistant vest
and the costume worn in the 1990 movie, RoboCop 2. In
addition, the Museum has been designated as the official
repository for oral history transcripts from members of the
Society of Former Special Agents of the FBI.
In the area of education, the
National Law Enforcement Museum will offer a wide range of
programs for school-age children, families, adults and law
enforcement professionals. In fact, the Museum’s educational
efforts are already under way. A forensics-based science activity
for middle school students has been pilot tested, and staff are
currently developing a domestic violence awareness program that is
supported by the Verizon Foundation.
“The National Law Enforcement
Museum will be a must-see destination for people visiting the
nation’s capital,” Mr. Floyd said. “It will also be an important
hub for the study of law enforcement in America and for engaging
current and future generations in what the law enforcement
profession means to our society and our democracy,” he added.
The Museum is being designed by
Davis Buckley Architects and Planners, the DC firm that also
created the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, which was
dedicated in 1991. Exhibit design is being led by the Boston firm
of
Christopher Chadbourne & Associates, whose work also includes
the Donald W. Reynolds Museum and Education Center at Mount Vernon
and the National Museum of the Marine Corps, in Quantico, VA.
Clark Construction of Bethesda, MD, has been selected as the
project’s general contractor.
Funds for the construction and
development of the Museum are being raised privately by the NLEOMF,
which has launched an $80 million capital campaign called “A
Matter of Honor.” To date, law enforcement organizations,
corporations, foundations and individuals from across the country
have donated nearly $40 million toward that goal. The District of
Columbia Government has also been a strong supporter of the
project, authorizing up to $80 million in industrial revenue bonds
and providing a 20-year sales tax credit for the Museum worth up
to $10 million.
Major donations of $1 million or
more have come from Motorola, DuPont, Target, Verizon, Mag-Lite,
Advanced Interactive Systems, Panasonic, the California
Correctional Peace Officers Association and the Police Unity Tour,
whose $5 million donation is the single largest to date. Former
Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton serve as co-chairs of
the Museum’s National Honorary Campaign Committee, which also
includes seven former Attorneys General of the United States, as
well as other former government officials and celebrities. The
Museum was authorized by a public law enacted in 2000. The law was
authored by U.S. Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell, a former deputy
sheriff.

The mission of the National Law Enforcement Museum is to tell
the story of American law enforcement through exhibits,
collections, research and education. For more information, visit
www.LawEnforcementMuseum.org.
--###-- |
|
| |
Posted 4/16/2010
TAKE ACTION NOW - CONTACT YOU SENATOR AND
DELEGATE - LET THEM KNOW YOU WANT THEM TO SUPPORT THE GOVERNOR'S
RETIREMENT AMENDMENT!
To
find out who your representatives are use the following link:
http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform
Brothers and Sisters,
President Edwards, National Trustee Tom Stiles and I met with Governor
McDonnell asking him to remove budget language from HB30. The language on
line 469 2c would allow localities to start billing current employees up
to five percent toward their VRS contribution. Recently I forwarded a
press release from Governor McDonnell to you. Governor McDonnell has
agreed to support you, the men and woman in law enforcement by removing
budget language that would allow localities to start charging all current
employees up to five percent toward their retirement. This is a very
important issue and Governor McDonnell now more than ever needs our
support. I am urging you to contact your Delegate and Senator either by
phone or email and ask them to support the Governors amendment. It is
imperative that the members of the General Assembly know how important
this is to you. I am asking for you to be civil and respectful in your
message. I need you to remain the professionals that I know you are.
Localities across the commonwealth will jump at the opportunity to save
money in their budgets by billing it to you. I do not know at this time
how the House or Senate will vote on this. Let's hope they will support us
on this. Don't wait to contact your representative. The veto session
starts on April 21st 2010. If you hear back from your Delegate or Senator
please send me an email letting me know their position. My email is
THELAWMANII@verizon.net
Fraternally,
Kevin P. Carroll
Posted 4/15/2010
Brothers and Sisters,
President Edwards, National Trustee Tom Stiles and I met with Governor
McDonnell asking him to remove budget language from HB30. The language on
line 469 2c would allow localities to start billing current employees up
to five percent toward their VRS contribution. Recently I forwarded a
press release from Governor McDonnell to you. Governor McDonnell has
agreed to support you, the men and woman in law enforcement by removing
budget language that would allow localities to start charging all current
employees up to five percent toward their retirement. This is a very
important issue and Governor McDonnell now more than ever needs our
support. I am urging you to contact your Delegate and Senator either by
phone or email and ask them to support the Governors amendment. It is
imperative that the members of the General Assembly know how important
this is to you. I am asking for you to be civil and respectful in your
message. I need you to remain the professionals that I know you are.
Localities across the commonwealth will jump at the opportunity to save
money in their budgets by billing it to you. I do not know at this time
how the House or Senate will vote on this. Let's hope they will support us
on this. Don't wait to contact your representative. The veto session
starts on April 21st 2010. If you hear back from your Delegate or Senator
please send me an email letting me know their position. My email is
THELAWMANII@verizon.net
Fraternally,
Kevin P. Carroll
Posted
4/14/2010
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of Governor Bob McDonnell FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 13, 2010 Contact: Stacey Johnson Phone: (804)
225-4260E-mail: Stacey.Johnson@Governor.Virginia.Gov Governor McDonnell
to Send Down Budget Amendment Keeping Existing Retirement Contribution
System in Place for Current Local Government Employees RICHMOND-
As part of his package of budget amendments that must be completed by
midnight, Governor Bob McDonnell will ask the General Assembly to reject
a previously passed provision giving localities the ability to shift
retirement expenses to local government employees, including teachers,
police officers, sheriffs and others. The Governor will ask the General
Assembly to treat current local employees the same as current state
employees in the funding of their retirement plans.Speaking about his
amendment, Governor McDonnell noted, “The men and women who serve the
Commonwealth in our state and local governments have devoted their
professional lives to public service. It is important that we treat that
service with the respect it deserves. Current state and many local
employees took their jobs with the expectation that their retirement
contributions would come from their employer. We cannot turn our back on
that agreement. To do so would be unfair to Virginians who work hard for
our Commonwealth every day. We should make necessary changes to our
retirement system and I do support changes to the contribution
requirements for future state employees, and for future local employees
if a locality chooses to make such a change. For current government
employees a promise was made, and it should be kept.”The budget
introduced by the previous Administration called for current state
employees to contribute 1% of their payroll to their pensions in 2011
and 2% in 2012. As a candidate for Governor, McDonnell opposed such a
change in policy. Upon taking office he worked with the General Assembly
to remove this proposal from the budget. The General Assembly did pass a
budget amendment granting localities the authority to require current
local government employees to contribute to their retirements, in a
similar fashion as was proposed for current state employees. This
amendment will remove that authority.
| |
This
newsletter is distributed monthly to lodge leaders and
administrators nationwide to assist in the performance of
their duties. Please feel free to forward it to any member
in your lodge who may benefit from the content.
April 8, 2010 |
|
|
Secretary Pat Yoes |
 |
|
|
|
National Headquarters:
701 Marriott Drive
Nashville TN 37214
800-451-2711/615-399-0900
Fax: 615-399-0400
Click the Quick Link
|
|
|
|
PER CAPITA IS DUE!
Lodges who have not paid per capita run the risk of
being dropped. All Per Capita dues must be in the
National Office by May 1 and
are late on June 1.
|
|
New Lodges Formed |
| |
Join me in welcoming six more new local
lodges!
NY #920
NY International Officers
NY #135
Div School Safety Kings
CA #051
San Francisco Sheriffs MSA
UT #030
Heber Valley
IN #141
Chesterton
|
|
Order Your "My First Ride" CDs ! |
|
Click here to order:
Proceeds from the sale of
these CDs go to the FOP Disaster Relief Fund
|
2009
Memorial DVDs Available! |
| |
|
The 2009 National Peace Officers' Memorial Service
DVDs are now available from the Grand Lodge for just
$20 per DVD. To order click on this link:
For more information
call the Grand Lodge at 1-800-451-2711.
|
|
Order a copy of Pat's book - all proceeds go to
the FOP Foundation |

Order Now! |
|
"End of
Watch" Memorial Painting |
|
 |
Artist Ray Simon honors the lives of all of our fallen
law enforcement officials through the release of his
newest painting, Amor, Honoro, Officium,
Sacrificium, meaning Love, Honor, Duty,
Sacrifice, with a part of the proceeds going
directly to the F.O.P. Order now at
www.eowpainting.com.
Many customizable painting
options and choices are available.
|
|
|
UPS Survey Could Lead to Reduced
Shipping Rates
The Grand Lodge needs your help. We are exploring
the possibility of developing a program with UPS
whereby local and state lodges would join with the
Grand Lodge in receiving preferred rates for their
UPS Shipping cost.
To determine the amount of business opportunity
UPS can expect by providing us a nationally
preferred rate, they have developed a short survey
for all lodges to complete. UPS will review the
results and make a determination if the FOP will
be eligible for inclusion in an association
program.
There are only a few short questions, all
regarding your lodges preferred shipping vendor,
volume, and frequency of shipping. Please take a
few minutes to complete this survey by clicking on
This survey link will be active through April
31, 2010. At the conclusion of the survey, all
lodges who complete the survey will be included
in a raffle in which the winning lodge will
receive a UPS / NASCAR gift basket. Please
forward this request to other lodges and
encourage their participation.
|
Information about Adding New Members
The National Membership Staff have been receiving
numerous requests from Local and State Lodges to go
just ahead and approve gains entered into the
Membership Information System without a Per Capita
payment being forwarded to the Grand Lodge. The
National Constitution and By-Laws, Article 3, Section
E states:
"Member in good standing," in respect to the Grand
Lodge, shall mean a member who fulfilled all
requirements of membership in good standing to his
respective subordinate and state lodges and for whom
appropriate per capita tax has been paid to the Grand
Lodge. Any member belonging to a state or subordinate
lodge that is delinquent or has been suspended shall
not be a member in good standing.
The Grand Lodge staff follows the Constitution and
only those members that we have received a payment on
will be approved and released from the Membership
Information System. After a period of sixty (60) days
if payment has not been received they are to "REJECT"
the gain and it will be the responsibility of the
State Lodge to resubmit those members once Per Capita
has been received and forwarded to the Grand Lodge.
|
|
Controversy Regarding
FOP Decals
Standing rule #5 requires
that members not transfer FOP Active Member decals to
non members. While some states have state laws
prohibiting displaying police and related insignias, a
recent court ruling challenges this law. This makes it
even more imperative for lodges to police the use of
Active Member decals and take appropriate action
against members who violate this standing rule.
The following story first
appeared in the Cincinnati Enquirer on March 31 and
was written by Dan Horn:
Judge Upholds Man's FOP Sticker
Jasbir Singh wasn't looking to become a defender of the
First Amendment when he took on the village of
Lockland,Ohio in a court fight two years ago. He just
wanted to put a bumper sticker on his car.
But the grocery store owner broke legal ground Wednesday
when a federal judge ruled that village police violated
the U.S. Constitution by charging Singh in 2008 with
unlawfully displaying a police union sticker.
U.S. District Judge Michael Barrett said the village's
ban, which makes displaying such stickers a misdemeanor
offense for non-police officers, unreasonably restricts
the First Amendment right to free expression.
"The conduct of displaying an emblem is expressive,"
Barrett wrote in his decision. "The defendants are
trying to control the content of certain displays on
motor vehicles."
The village's law expressly forbids the display of an
"emblem of a law enforcement agency or an organization
of law enforcement officers" unless the person
displaying the emblem is an officer or a formal member
of the group.
Singh's Fraternal Order of Police sticker, which
included the letters "FOP," was deemed a violation of
the law because he is not an officer or a member of the
union. Singh said a police officer friend gave him the
sticker and he put it on his car to show support for
police.
He was pulled over in 2008 while driving to his store in
Lockland and was given a ticket for violating the ban.
"That was very surprising," he said. "I was not speeding
and I committed no traffic offense." Village and police
union lawyers could not be reached Wednesday, but they
have defended the law as a reasonable way to prevent
people from impersonating law enforcement officers.
They argued in court that the law makes officers safer
because they might let down their guard if they see a
police union sticker on a car during a traffic stop.
Barrett rejected that argument, saying officers know
they always must be careful when approaching a car.
"Unfortunately, police officers never know who is
driving a car until they approach the driver," he wrote.
"Regardless of who the car is registered to or what
emblem is placed on a car, the driver could be anyone."
The judge said free speech and expression rights are not
absolute, noting that restrictions may be permitted when
the speech involves "fighting words" or poses a "true
threat."
But he said neither is the case with the police sticker
ban.
Singh's lawyer, Robert Newman, said stickers like the
one on Singh's car are common throughout the country and
don't indicate an attempt to impersonate a police
officer.
"You have a right to have emblems on your car that are
supportive of the police," Newman said.
|
|
Standing Rules Change for Social
Networking Sites
As reported in my last newsletter, the Grand Lodge
has previously prohibited the use of the Fraternal
Order of Police name and/or star emblem on social
networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and
Twitter. At the Spring Board of Trustees
meeting section D of the current Standing Rules
pertaining to the use of the FOP name and/or logo on
the Internet was changed to the below:
Steps to using
Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other social
networking sites for Lodges
1. FOP Lodges may use the
Fraternal Order of Police name and the star emblem on
Facebook, MySpace and Twitter, subject to the
guidelines and policies. Other social networking sites
will require the approval of the Grand Lodge.
2. The Lodge President or
Secretary must submit a written request to the
National Secretary for approval of the social
networking page and use of the FOP name and logo.
Individual Members using FOP Marks on their personal
profiles
By using one or more of the Marks on any social
networking site or other website, individual members
agree that they are bound by the following policy:
·
Members may
use the collective membership marks for the sole
purpose of identifying themselves as members of the
Fraternal Order of Police.
·
Members may
not use the collective membership marks in connection
with any commercial or for-profit purpose.
·
Members may not use the collective
membership marks in any manner which is profane,
abusive, indecent, inappropriate or otherwise improper
in the sole judgment of the Grand Lodge.
The National Board of Trustees reserves the right to
rescind these policies at any time.
|
|
|
|
Posted 4/8/2010
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE OF VA
VIRGINIA STATE LODGE
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 8, 2010
TO: EXECUTIVE BOARD - DIRECTORS – LOCAL LODGE
PRESIDENTS & SECRETARIES
FROM: PRESIDENT Thomas Edwards
SUBJECT: STATE CONFERENCE HOSTED BY
Chesterfield Lodge
#47 & Henrico Lodge #4
THE 2010 VIRGINIA
STATE CONFERENCE will be held at the Richmond, Kroger Center located at
1021 Kroger Center Blvd., Richmond
Sunday August 01, 2010,
3 P.M. EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING
Monday August 02, 2010,
NOON-Opening Ceremonies/Memorial Service/Business
Tuesday August 03, 2010
9 AM – 5pm Open training-Directors must attend
Wednesday August 04,
2010 9 AM - Continue Conference business
Thursday August 05, 2010
9 AM - Complete Conference business/Elections
The room rate is
$99.00 plus tax, per night for a single or double room.
To ensure this rate,
RESERVATIONS MUST BE MADE BY July 1, 2010.
The
Executive Board members are authorized four nights lodging, per diem and
mileage.
Directors are authorized three nights lodging, Conference events package,
four days per diem and mileage. Directors must register for their own
events package and you will be reimbursed.
Everyone
attending the conference must fill out a registration form (even if you
do not purchase the package)
As
in the past, the Lodge Director or a representative from the lodge is
expected to attend the conference. Since the State pays for the Directors
to attend there is no excuse not to send someone. If for some reason no
one is able to represent your lodge, the State Lodge must be contacted
prior to the meeting by E-mail or letter.
ALL
DIRECTORS REPORTS MUST BE SENT TO THE STATE OFFICE BY July 1, 2010 (This
applies even if no one will be attending the meeting.)
If you
have any questions, please call the State Office 1-800-367-0317. I will
look forward to seeing you at the Board meeting.
You must make your own
hotel reservations – Call 804-379-3800
Posted 3/29/2010
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BILL TO GET HOUSE
VOTE AFTER RECESS!
Representative Steny H. Hoyer, Majority
Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, told National President Chuck
Canterbury and Executive Director Jim Pasco that H.R. 413, the "Public
Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act," would be "among the first"
bills considered on the House floor following the Easter recess.
With Members of Congress home
in their States and districts, this is a perfect time to make your voice
heard!
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND ASK HIM OR HER
TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF H.R. 413 AFTER THE RECESS!!!
You can find your Representatives'
district office phone number using
www.congress.org, or contact their office through the U.S. Capitol
switchboard at 202-225-3121. When you reach their Washington office, ask
for the district office phone number as well!.
The bill would recognize the fundamental right of public safety
employees--primarily law enforcement officers and firefighters--to form
and join unions and bargain collectively with their employers over wages,
hours, and working conditions without undermining existing State labor
laws. Basically, H.R. 413 would require:
- • the right of employees to form and
join a union;
- • a requirement that the public
safety employer recognize the union and agree to bargain over hours,
wages, and the terms and conditions of employment; and
- • the availability of an impasse
resolution mechanism such as fact-finding or mediation.
The legislation does not require binding
arbitration and would prohibit strikes and lockouts. You should emphasize
that collective bargaining is a critical tool to resolve differences, not
create them.
Law enforcement officers and firefighters do not have a traditional
labor-management relationship. The bottom line is not shareholder profit
versus wages, but how to best keep the public safe and get the officers
safely home at the end of their shifts. The success of the law
enforcement mission depends on an open dialogue that is absent in far too
many of our departments today.
The FOP website has some great information on this important bill:
http://www.fop.net/legislative/issues/bargain/index.shtml
If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact the National Legislative Office at 202-547-8189!
DON'T DELAY -- CONTACT YOUR MEMBERS
OF CONGRESS TODAY!!!
Posted 3/17/2010
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING BILL TO GET HOUSE
VOTE NEXT WEEK!
Last week, National President
Chuck Canterbury appeared at a hearing held by the House Subcommittee on
Health, Education, Labor and Pensions to support H.R. 413, the "Public
Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act." The hearing was held in
advance of a full mark-up and vote by the full Committee on Education and
Labor, which we had hoped would be scheduled for this week.
However, Committee leadership, both majority and minority, have agreed to
allow the bill to proceed directly to the House floor.
Sometime next week, the full House of Representatives will consider H.R.
413 on the floor.
IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT YOU CONTACT
YOUR REPRESENTATIVE AND ASK HIM OR HER TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF H.R. 413 NEXT
WEEK!!!
You can reach the U.S.
Capitol switchboard at (202) 225-3121 and ask for your Representative by
name.
The bill would recognize the fundamental right of public safety
employees--primarily law enforcement officers and firefighters--to form
and join unions and bargain collectively with their employers over wages,
hours, and working conditions without undermining existing State labor
laws. Basically, H.R. 413 would require:
-
• the right of employees
to form and join a union;
-
• a requirement that the
public safety employer recognize the union and agree to bargain over
hours, wages, and the terms and conditions of employment; and
-
• the availability of an
impasse resolution mechanism such as fact-finding or mediation.
The legislation does not
require binding arbitration and would prohibit strikes and lockouts. You
should emphasize that collective bargaining is a critical tool to resolve
differences, not create them. Law enforcement officers and firefighters
do not have a traditional labor-management relationship. The bottom line
is not shareholder profit versus wages, but how to best keep the public
safe and get the officers safely home at the end of their shifts. The
success of the law enforcement mission depends on an open dialogue that is
absent in far too many of our departments today.
The FOP website has some great information on this important bill:
http://www.fop.net/legislative/issues/bargain/index.shtml
If you need any additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact the National Legislative Office at 202-547-8189!
Posted 3/5/2010
SENATE COMMITTEE APPROVES LEOSA BILL!!!
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the Fraternal Order of Police,
welcomed today’s news that S. 1132, the “Law Enforcement Officers’ Safety
Act Improvements Act,” was favorably reported by the Senate Committee on the
Judiciary on a unanimous voice vote.
“I want to first express my deep appreciation to Chairman Leahy for his
commitment to this issue,” Canterbury said. “I know he’s been trying to
move the bill for us since late last year, and his persistence paid off
today.”
Senator Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT), the Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, is
also the sponsor of S. 1132. He had repeatedly placed the legislation on
the Judiciary Committee’s agenda, but the weather, pressing nominations, and
the threat of controversial amendments forced him to hold the bill over on
several occasions. The bill had broad bipartisan support with Senator
Jefferson B. Sessions III (R-AL), the Committee’s Ranking Member, and Jon
Kyl (R-AZ) as lead cosponsors.
“We’re very fortunate to have a champion like Chairman Leahy and strong
supporters like Senator Sessions,” Canterbury said. “Many of our retired
officers are facing significant hurdles because some States have failed to
implement the law as intended by Congress; this bill will really help them
overcome those obstacles.”
The bill would improve certain provisions of the Law Enforcement Officers’
Safety Act (LEOSA), especially with respect to retired law enforcement
officers, and would make clear that law enforcement officers employed by the
Amtrak and Federal Reserve Police Departments, as well as those employed by
the executive branch of the Federal Government who are classified as a
GS-0083 meet the definition of “qualified law enforcement officer” in
current law. The bill would also lower the aggregate years of service
needed to meet the definition of “qualified retired law enforcement officer”
from fifteen (15) to ten (10) and removes confusing language related to that
same definition. The bill will now move to the Senate floor for further
consideration.
Posted 2/24/10
BUDGET AMENDMENT
Attached is a budget amendment
that would allow localities to charge CURRENT employees any portion of
the 5% they now pay. This is nothing more than a tax on current
employees. In the 80's employees had not seen a raise for several years.
Employers decided to pick up the employee portion of VRS in lieu of
giving raises. they now want to take that back and make current
employees pay the 5%.
This will be heard on the House floor tomorrow and it will be our only
chance to protect CURRENT employees from this tax increase. We need to
do everything we can to kill this amendment
Art Lipscomb
Legislative Director
Virginia Professional Fire Fighters
18 North Eighth St.
Richmond, Va. 23219
Cell 434 941-4086
Fax 804 643-4064
Posted 2/23/10
We have one chance to kill this bill before it on the Senate floor.
SB 232 Retirement System; changes early and normal
retirement ages for those employed after July 1, 2010.
Summary as introduced:
Virginia Retirement System; early and normal retirement age.
Changes the early and normal retirement ages for a person who first
commences employment on or after July 1, 2010, to coincide with the
person's early and normal retirement ages as provided under the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 416 et seq.
Use this link to find your Senator:
http://conview.state.va.us/whosmy.nsf/main?openform
It is imperative you generate as many calls and
emails as possible to protect your retirement!
Art Lipscomb
Posted 12/15/09
FOP MAKES STRONG PUSH ON BARGAINING BILL
FOP President Leads Effort to
Include Our Bill on End of Year Agenda
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the
Fraternal Order of Police, spent all of last week in Washington, D.C.
working in tandem with the staff in the National Legislative Office in an
effort to get the language of S. 1611, “Public Employee-Employer Cooperation
Act,” incorporated into several likely pieces of legislation that Congress
will be considering before ending the session.
“We’re cautiously optimistic,” Canterbury said. “Congress has several bills
that it must complete before concluding its business for the year. The fact
is, we have a lot of bipartisan support for the bill and we’ve approached it
in a very honest and open way. We do have a chance of getting this done.”
The legislation, which was introduced by Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH) and the
late Senator Edward M. Kennedy (D-MA), would recognize the fundamental right
of public safety employees to form and join unions and bargain collectively
with their employers over wages, hours, and working conditions without
undermining existing State collective bargaining laws. The legislation
does not require binding arbitration, protects existing right-to-work laws,
and specifically prohibits strikes and lockouts. The bill has attracted a
lot of support in the House and Senate from both sides of the aisle.
“The FOP and our friends at the International Association of Fire Fighters
have been working to pass this legislation for more than a decade,”
Canterbury said. “Just as we were very close last May, winning a key
procedural vote, I do think we have the support we need. It’s the timing.”
Posted 12/15/09
HIGHWAY SAFETY AND BIG TRUCKS:
Correcting Inaccuracies Circulated
by Special Interest Lobbyists
Section 2 of H.R. 1799, the
“Safe and Efficient Transportation Act”
The Fraternal Order of Police has examined
one component of H.R. 1799, the “Safe and Efficient Transportation Act,”
which would permit States to allow six-axled vehicles up to 97,000
pounds to operate on Interstate Systems routes within that State. Current
limits allow five-axled vehicles to travel these routes carrying up to
80,000 pounds.
For the FOP and all law enforcement officers, this is an issue of officer
and highway safety and it is in that vein that the FOP examined the issue.
Large, heavy trucks operating at speed can pose a danger when incidents
occur on our nation’s highways and there is scientific data available that
suggests increasing the allowable weight of these vehicles will increase the
hazard these vehicles pose. In addition, the increased weight will cause
further stress on out nation’s infrastructure, meaning that the Interstate
highways and bridges will deteriorate at a greater pace.
Law enforcement officers, agencies and organizations which support the
increased weight limits and the addition of another axle correctly argue
that current restrictions on weight forces these large trucks off the
Interstates and onto local and State roads, where they pose a much greater
hazard to local traffic and local law enforcement officers. Data supports
the conclusion that trucks operating on Interstates have significantly less
accidents than trucks operating on secondary roads. Additionally, trucks
which are forced onto secondary roads have a much greater impact on
infrastructure, the repair and maintenance of which comes from local and
State budgets. Finally, scientific studies suggest that the additional
breaking power of the sixth axle offsets the hazard presented by the
additional weight.
Proponents of increasing the weight limit argue that this will reduce the
number of truck miles traveled, but opponents of the heavier trucks counter
that, over time, as more trucks are produced or retrofitted with the sixth
axle, these vehicles will return to the highways in equal numbers.
The issue for the FOP is one of safety. However, this issue is clouded by
special interests which all claim to have highway safety as their paramount
concern. These special interests are spending significant amounts of money
in this debate and their efforts have completely clouded reliable scientific
data as to how any change in the weight limits would affect officer and
highway safety.
While individual law enforcement leaders and local/State organizations may
have taken different positions on this issue, responsible, national
organizations like the National Troopers Coalition and the Fraternal Order
of Police will not. No segment of our nation’s law enforcement officers
will be more affected by this provision than State and Highway patrolmen and
without greater consensus on this issue on the part of these officers, the
FOP will continue to monitor and research, but will take no position at this
time.
For more information on this issue, contact the National Legislative Office.
Posted 8/17/09
Gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell
McDonnell
Announces Anti-Gang Policy
Questions for Governor’s
Candidates
McDonnell Public
Safety highlights
Letters for Packet
Gubernatorial candidate McDonnell pitches his views to police
FOP COVER LETTER FINALE
Public Safety Policy
RollOut
Posted 8/17/09
Flyer for Steve Shannon
Posted 8/17/09
Message from Attorney General Candidate
Posted 8/17/09
The Gates Case: After Action Report
by Jim
Pasco, Executive Director
On the morning of 23 July 2009, at the direction of National President Chuck
Canterbury, I contacted the White House to advise them of the FOP’s concerns
regarding the President’s remarks at the previous night’s press conference
which were directed at Sergeant James Crowley and the Cambridge Police
Department. I also advised them that National President Canterbury would
issue a formal statement later in the day.
I was subsequently contacted by a second member of the White House staff,
who told me that all other police groups had committed to remain silent on
the issue. I told this staff member that we were unlikely to remain
silent. I suggested that he call National President Canterbury, who was
in a travel status, and gave him National President Canterbury’s cell phone
number. I immediately called National President Canterbury and briefed him
on both my conversations with White House staff.
About ten minutes later, National President Canterbury, having by then
spoken with the White House himself, coordinated with Arnie Larson,
President of the Massachusetts State Lodge, and instructed the Washington,
D.C. office to issue a strong statement in support of Sgt. Crowley and the
Cambridge Police Department. We did so at approximately 3 pm that
afternoon. By early that evening, as a result of FOP leadership on the
issue, all other national police groups--except the National Association of
Police Organizations (NAPO)–rethought their positions and also made
statements in support of the men and women of the Cambridge Police
Department.
We were inundated with media calls but only responded to print media to
ensure a clear and moderate message. National President Canterbury declined
all invitations to appear on talk shows and television news programs.
On the following day, we were happy to comply with a White House request to
help facilitate a call from President Obama to Sgt. Crowley, the content of
which has been extensively reported.
There is no doubt that the FOP’s prompt, thoughtful, and aggressive action
ultimately mininmized potential adverse fallout from this matter, and
brought focus to the simple fact that Sergeant James Crowley is a good
police officer in a good department, and that he and his colleagues were
merely doing their jobs that day–and doing them well.
Posted 2/15/09
Byrne-JAG and COPS Funding Retained in
Final Stimulus Bill
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the
Fraternal Order of Police, expressed his satisfaction, and a certain measure
of relief, with the news that funding for the Edward J. Byrne Memorial
Justice Assistance Grant (Byrne-JAG) program and the Office for Community
Oriented Policing Services (COPS) hiring program remained part of the
economic stimulus package following the work of the conference committee.
“Our staff worked through last weekend and all this week, pushing hard to
make sure that this vital law enforcement funding would be part of whatever
stimulus package Congress came up with,” Canterbury said. “State and local
law enforcement efforts have been hurting with the severe cuts imposed last
year. Restoring this funding is absolutely necessary if we are to keep our
streets and neighborhoods safe.”
Canterbury traveled to Washington, D.C. earlier this week and, on Monday,
met with key Congressional leaders to lobby for their support to retain the
Byrne-JAG and COPS funding provisions in the bill.
The economic stimulus bill, H.R. 1, the “American Recovery and Reinvestment
Act,” passed the House in late January on a straight party-line vote. Over
the weekend, the Senate amended the bill significantly and passed it on a
61-37 vote. This week, a House-Senate conference committee reconciled the
two different versions into a single bill for consideration. The FOP was
afforded the opportunity to review documents which indicate that the final
numbers for State and local law enforcement assistance will be very close to
the House-passed mark, which provided $3 billion for the Byrne-JAG program
and $1 billion for the COPS hiring program.
“We may have a few more battles to fight along the way, but the outcome,
for our funding at least, looks very positive,” Canterbury said.
posted 2/7/09
Senate Cuts Deal on Stimulus; Retains Full
Funding for COPS
Byrne-JAG Grants also funded at twice FY08 Level
Chuck Canterbury, National President of the
Fraternal Order of Police, welcome this weekend’s news that a deal had been
worked out to pass the economic stimulus package, which includes more than
$1 billion for the Edward J. Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant
(Byrne-JAG) program and $1 billion for the hiring program administered by
the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS).
“We had quite a fight on our hands long into Friday night and throughout the
weekend,” Canterbury explained. “Senators were looking to reduce the
overall cost of the House bill and many were looking to cut critical funding
for State and local law enforcement. Fortunately, most of the targeted
funds survived and should be part of the final bill.”
The House bill, H.R. 1, the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,” passed
in late January on a straight party-line vote. The Senate has spent the
last two weeks debating its own bill and trying to craft an amendment that
would get them the sixty votes needed to pass the bill. Senators E.
Benjamin Nelson (D-NE) and Susan M. Collins (R-ME) offered a language that
should attract sixty votes.
“These are critical funds, and it is entirely appropriate for them to be
included in this package,” Canterbury explained. “The COPS hiring program
will be able to add 13,000 more officers to the streets over the next three
years, and the Byrne-JAG program will support a diverse range of law
enforcement, prosecutorial, and other criminal justice initiatives in
communities across the country, including multijurisdictional drug and gang
task forces, cold case units, identity theft investigations, school violence
prevention programs, services for threatened jurors, witness protection
programs, and victims’ rights and hate crime programs.”
The other programs funded in proposed amendment are as follows:
- •
$1.05 billion for the Edward J. Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant Programs;
- •
$1 billion for the hiring
program administered by the Office of Community Oriented Policing
Services;
- •
$440 million for competitive
grants to support prevention and intervention programs, as well as
certain prosecutorial activities
- •
$300 million for assistance to
tribal law enforcement;
- •
$300 million for programs
established by the Violence Against Women Act;
- •
$150 million for assistance to
law enforcement in rural areas, to prevent and combat crime,
especially drug-related crime
- •
$100 million to combat criminal
activity stemming from the southwest border;
- •
$100 million for victims’
assistance programs; and
- •
$50 million for internet crimes
against children initiatives.
The Senate expects to vote to end debate on the measure on Monday and to
pass the final bill sometime early next week. The differences between the
House-passed bill (H.R. 1) and the expected Senate bill (S. 1) will be
reconciled by a conference committee.
“Key members of both houses have already reached out to secure our support
and help in making sure these funds remain in the final bill,” Canterbury
said. “We’ve come out on top after a tough fight, but there’s still some
battles to be fought ahead.”

Copyright Henrico FOP4 2009
Webmaster - webmaster@henricofop4.com |